ICBP - Please Support EDM 1895 - Social Security Benefits Up-rating Regulation
Dear "Name of
MP",
12th June 2011
As you know the International
Consortium of British Pensioners (ICBP), has been engaged with our
partners in Australia, Canada and South Africa in a prolonged action to
correct a long standing wrong that has had dire consequences for the
most worthy of British Veterans, and many other British subjects, at
home, and around the world. We ask you to please help end this harm by
putting your signature to EDM 1895, namely:
That this house notes that under
regulation 3 in the Social Security Benefits Up-rating Regulation 2011
more than half a million British people who have retired to any one of
more than 120 countries including the majority of Commonwealth
countries have their rightful British State pension frozen and are
denied their rights to annual up-rating to such pension, meaning that
they continue to lose money that they are entitled to having paid
National Insurance contributions during their working lives; further
notes that perpetuation of this regulation will impact on the freedom
of choice of country of residence for many constituents upon their
retirement in coming years and calls upon this House to review
regulation 3 of the Up-rating Regulation and thus treat all British
pensioners with the dignity and fairness that they deserve in future
years.
Please view EDM 1895 – Social Security Benefits Up-rating Regulation, at the Parliamentary link: http://www.parliament.uk/edm/2010-11/1895
John Markham
ICBP - Director of UK Parliamentary Affairs
Open Letter to the House of Lords - Debate 9th March 2011
Dear "Name of Peer",
14th May 2011
We recently received this letter (please click-on this link),
from one of our members regarding an 9th March discussion in the House
of Lords on frozen pensions in response to a question from Lord
Shipley. It expands on the average data given by Lord Freud, and shows
how the Government’s current pensions freezing policy increasingly
impacts each frozen pensioners’ financial situation as they age. In
effect the policy discriminates on the basis of age - they get a less
valuable pension as they get older.
Both Houses and the European Court of Human Rights have said in the
past that this is an acceptable state of affairs! The policy may have
seemed justifiable 65 years ago when uprating of the State Pension was
first enacted but most people are incredulous that such a policy
continues today, especially when the Government consistently expresses
concern about fairness, dignity and the well being of the elderly. The
truth is that changing the policy and removing the freeze would
encourage more pensioners to move abroad in retirement and actually
provide a net benefit to the Treasury.
Please click-on this link -
http://www.pension-parity-uk.com/sundaytelegraph.jpg - to read a very
significant article on this topic that was published in the Sunday
Telegraph on March 13th 2011.
Thank you for your consideration of this important matter and please do
not hesitate to contact us for much more information on this
unacceptable situation.
Sincerely
Tony Bockman
President
The International Consortium of British Pensioners
BROKEN
FAITH -- Book of Heroes
Dear "Name of MP or Peer",
16 January 2011
On the 16th Dec 2010 the International
Consortium of British Pensioners handed over a book, "Broken Faith," to
Steve Webb, Minister for Pensions, at No 10 Downing St, for the
consideration of the Government. The book contains brief service
records of 104 veterans who served the country loyally, details of
their decorations and brief personal comments. These veterans are
so disgusted at the wholly immoral practice of freezing their Basic
State Pension that they are considering returning their medals to the
Crown. The depth of this feeling reflects the ever increasing
resentment of the 543,000 overseas recipients of the British State
Pension, who have their pension frozen for no better reason than where
they reside, whilst a further half million overseas recipients of BSP
who reside within the EU or 16 other countries where a "reciprocal
agreement " is in place, receive their full annual pension entitlement
uprated annually. You may like to read a copy of the book, which you
can find on our website. Just click on
http://www.pension-parity-uk.com/brokenfaith.htm
Your active support in persuading the
Government to right this terrible wrong will be much appreciated.
John Markham
ICBP - Director of UK
Parliamentary Affairs
MATRIX
REPORT
Dear "Name of
MP",
31 October 2010
You will recall that at the time of
the General Election we sent you a petition on behalf of the
International Consortium of British Pensioners (ICBP). We
requested your support in the fight to achieve Pension Parity and thus
put an end to the immoral and unjust policy of freezing the pensions of
some 50% of all British Pensioners who live Overseas (dependent
ONLY on where they reside).
Since that time a publicly recognized
Economic Think Tank has studied the economics of changing this policy;
furthermore there have been a number of pensioner surveys. These show
that the provision of Pension Parity would potentially provide much
needed, and significant benefits to the UK economy.
We have much pleasure in providing a
one page fact sheet for your information.
To obtain your copy, please click on
this link:
http://www.pension-parity-uk.com/Matrix%20Report.htm
Your support, as always is much
appreciated.
Tony Bockman
Chairman ICBP

30th October 2010
The
International Consortium of British Pensioners
commissioned a recent study by
the economics think tank, Matrix Evidence, using data provided by
HMG
resources, which shows that over the next 15 years with current
emigration
levels remaining the same, recipients of British State Pensions who
move abroad
to countries where their UK state pension is frozen will save the UK
economy a
total of £33 billion.
This
is because UK residents over the age of 65 currently costs the UK
taxpayer
£8,189 per annum arising from average benefit payments of £2,938, share
of NHS
costs of £4,276 and social care costs of £975. Once lost tax receipts
have been
accounted for, this means that British pensioners who emigrate outside
the EU
in retirement save the UK
economy a net total of £4,417 per capita per annum.
According
to DWP some 543,000 pensioners out of a total of just over 1.1 million
expat
recipients of British
State pensions
currently reside
in countries where their pensions are frozen. There are 185,000
pensioners
living in reciprocal agreement countries, with the remainder living in
the EU
where they receive not only full pension upratings but also other
transferable
benefits. British pensioners residing outside the EU therefore
currently
provide a saving to the Treasury of £3.2 billion per annum, £2.5
billion of which
is from pensioners living in countries where their British state
pension is
frozen.
A series of recent surveys have shown high numbers of pensioners who
are keen
to retire overseas. The Daily Express published on the 25th August 2010
a
survey conducted by Aon Consulting, which indicated that 60% of all
Britons
"are desperate to escape the UK by retiring overseas". The Week magazine in February 2010 reported a
similar
survey from the Times indicating 42% considering emigration. More
importantly,
a survey carried out amongst pensioners resident in the UK in
July 2010
by ICBP, AGEUK and the NPC showed that 44% of all respondents would
consider a
move abroad in retirement and 22% of those interviewed would consider
emigrating to a "frozen" country. The survey also found that the
frozen pension deters 39% of potential emigrants from considering
moving
abroad. This equates to nearly one million pensioners who would move
abroad if
pensions were uprated across the board.
From these
surveys it is fair to estimate that significant
numbers of pensioners, potentially between half a million and one
million,
would emigrate over the next 10-15 years were pensions unfrozen. This
would
lead to an additional annual saving of between £2.2 billion per annum
and £4.4 billion
per annum, which could then be used to ease the cost of domestic
pensions. This
is not to mention the relief on housing pressures that greater
emigration could
provide.
Can HMG really afford to penalize would be pensioner
emigrants?